THERE was a fascinating piece in The Economist this month on why the Mormons - a relatively small USA religious sect with a very strange history - have succeeded beyond their numbers in terms both political and commercial.
The article gives several possible explanations.
The 19th-century founder Joseph Smith and his followers were hounded out of New York both for heresy and unacceptable doctrines.
Finally, Brigham Young found them a safe haven in Utah. This sense of being outsiders and unwanted has often acted as a spur to achievement.
They have always valuedmaterial success. The Marriott School of Management at Brigham Young University is one of the best in the country. They also give 10 per cent of their income to the church.
Mormons - men and women - are expected to spend about two years as missionaries away from home, selling a religion that sounds more unlikely than the unlikeliest brands of Christianity.
I guess if you can cope with that, you can sell anything.
And whereas most youngsters who take a year or two off after high school indulge themselves, Mormons - who don't drink alcohol or coffee and are supposed to reserve sex for marriage - spend their time off dealing with difficult and unusual situations which are far more likely to teach them survival skills than the typical overindulged, over-financed, overprotected Western child.
Indeed, the article suggests that it is the two-year compulsory army service most young Israelis undergo (or used to) that gives them, too, the competitive edge wherever they go around the world.
Mormons regard creating "order out of chaos" to be a divine trait, the result of which is an efficient, unitary religious organisation that contrasts with the ill-disciplined, fractious, divided chaos that characterises all the major world religions today. Of course, it helps to be small and centralised.
Naturally, I was immediately drawn to making comparisons with Jews. We, too, have done well commercially beyond our numbers and we share a sense of alienation and persecution.
Our religion is also commerce friendly and our history has pushed us into such areas to survive. But in our small little religion we have probably as many denominations sects, splits and variations as any of the religions who are a million times greater in number than we are.
There is fierce rivalry between different communities. We have been scattered and blown around by violence.
Although a common ritual and language has kept some sort of central core, the reality is that we are a pot-pourri of different cultures, races, nationalities and loyalties.
Apart from ultra-orthodoxy, the attrition rate is staggering and it is hard to argue that religion plays any part - let alone defines - the success of Israeli entrepreneurs.
We are as fractious as communists and as anti-establishment as anarchists. So organisation, cohesion and discipline are not our fortes.
But on the other hand, our record shows that it is not just in commerce that we do well. We are just as successful in virtually every area of human intellectual activity (let's not talk about sport).
So what is the real secret of our success? Indeed, being disliked, envied and persecuted, like the Mormons, we have learned to be self-sufficient.
We have had to pull ourselves out of the muck by our own shoestrings with no affirmative action, no preferential treatment, no support structure, and the words of Hillel 2,000 years ago: "If I am not for myself, who will be for me, but if I am only for myself, what am I?"
And this is why I worry. Because we are now creating a different kind of Jew in two contrasting ways.
There is now, around the Jewish world - but mainly in Israel - a culture of religious dependence on handouts.
Study is an essential part of our tradition. Study is something we are religiously bound to do throughout our lives.
However, at one time everyone who studied also had to have a job. But now a whole generation has been encouraged to be entirely dependent on welfare, rich parents or willing donors.
It was never so before or on such a grand scale. This culture of dependence can only lead to disaster. Large numbers of Jews rely on indulgent parents or that lovely Yiddish word shtiklech (fiddles).
Fiddle this, fiddle that, look for a quick deal, a windfall, a lottery win, a smuggle, anything but a real career, a proper job - because in the end Ma and Pa will bail me out.
I used to argue that what gave us the edge was Talmudic training, brainpower, religious discipline and the need for self-sufficiency.
But now I don't know any more. Nothing destroys initiative like having it too easy.
It is not a matter of wealth. It is a matter of culture. If we change our culture from dynamic to passive, we will lose.
Thomas Friedman wrote in the NY Times last week that he does not see any new leadership in the Arab world, despite the much-trumpeted "Spring".
No up and coming leader is prepared to think out of the box, to stop blaming the West, Israel, everybody else for their woes.
They all claim Islam is the answer, but to the Arab street Islam is the handout that the Brotherhood, Hamas and Hezbollah offer, or the subsidies the oil-rich states provide.
They also want an overnight fix without changing the game plan, without struggling to improve.
Perhaps that is why the Almighty is not giving us peace. Conflict is the only option left to force us to face an existential crisis.
What God is telling us is to get off our butts, whether we are saints or scholars, would-be tycoons or missionaries.
Remember, the Israelites wanted to stay in Egypt, in comfortable slavery. They needed a push. God helps those who help themselves!
By the way you can catch up on all my past articles on my blog www.jeremyrosen.com/blog
And if you want to you can get my blogs sent directly to your e mail by going to www.jeremyrosen.com/phplist/?p=subscribe
Visit Jeremy at www.jeremyrosen.com
E-MAIL: comment@jewishtelegraph.com